The Purpose of the Committee

The Canadian Committee For Constitutional Courts is dedicated to the creation of an independent and competent justice system in Canada that meets the express and mandatory requirements of the Canadian Constitution, the United Nations Univeral Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Covenant on Political and Civil Rights.

Proposals For Reform

Scroll down to bottom of blog for Proposals For Reform by the Canadian Committee for Constitutional Courts that have been send to Prime Minister Harper and Justice Richard Wagner who recenlty expressed concerns about Canada's system of justice.

Monday, February 8, 2016

Canadian Minister Admits High Level Corruption At Canada's Department of Justice

Canada's Department of Justice has a well earned reputation for corruption.

Last week, Carolyn Ann BennettCanada's Minister of Indigenous and Northern Affairs admitted that lawyers and Alberta Judge Rosemary Nation both employees and agents of Canada's Department of Justice, had cheated over 1,000 victims of some of the most vile crimes in human history that took place in Canadian territory . This is another example of legal trickery that is commonplace in Canada's legal and court system and seems to have no end.

Click here to more on despicable conduct by government lawyers and their handpicked judge. 
Rosemary Nation
It is possible that Rosemary Nation (shown in photo on right) made her inhumane and depraved  ruling  because she was threatened  with blackmail or murder by the same criminal gang operating inside
Canada's court system that murdered many of the judges and other witnesses identified on the Water War Crimes  web site.

Click here to visit the Graveyard of the Guilty on the Water War Crimes Web Site

Intelligent observers now recognize that Justice Nation's heartlessly cruel decision was influence by high level insiders legal officials at Canada's Department of Justice that has, since Canada's creation waged a relentless war of genocide against Canada's indigenous population using crooked judges to incarcerate adults, kidnap children and steal property.

This well established Canadian Department of Justice tradition has been protected by the complicit Canadian media that was allied to Canadian with resource extraction companies that wished to exterminate indigenous populations so their activities would be unrestrained.

In some Canadian provinces indigenous populations make up 90 % of the prison population.

Friday, October 9, 2015

Victim of Canadian Freemasonry Requests Public Inquiry

Public Inquiry Canada

September 25, 2015

The Right Honourable Stephen Harper, MP, PC
Prime Minister of Canada
Office of the Prime Minister
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, ON
Canada K1A 0A2

Dear Prime Minister Harper:
This letter is a respectful request for an immediate Public Inquiry regarding the infiltration of a Freemason network into government services. This extended inter-provincial network is operating as a white-collar criminal gang inside government, by abusing the authority they hold in their public service jobs.

Freemasons assist other Freemasons as a working network, so official government agents are committing criminal offences in order to perform favours on request from other Freemasons. Their loyalties are to the Freemason network; not to the taxpayers who are funding the operation of government.
Few people even know what Freemasonry really is, because it is not discussed in mainstream news media ....

Friday, September 25, 2015

Recent Developments in Canada Prove Our Case - IS ELIZABETH BENNETT A CORRPUT JUDGE?

Elizabeth Bennett
It is the editors opinion that Elizabeth Bennett of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia is a corrupt judge.
Editors Note: We are receiving information that British Columbia Court of Appeal Chief Justice Robert Bauman is under an RCMP investigation for corruption that will be posted soon.   

 We will be posting information about her dirty attempt to deny access to justice for a British Columbia resident senior citizen who was attempting to appeal a dirty court order that took away all of his  retirement income. 

This was despicable conduct by this former government lawyer, Elizabeth Bennett, who was appointed to her position by one of Canada's most corrupt Prime Ministers the notorious Jean Chretien.

If you have information that confirms our opinion that Elizabeth Bennett is a dirty judge please contact Joe Adam at

This blog is under construction and more will be added as time permits.
Freemason Ujjal Dosanjh
Elizabeth Bennett first came to public attention when she was hand picked by the corrupt Department of Justice in Ottawa and the equally corrupt Ministry of the Attorney General for British Columbia to be the presiding judge in the "show trial" against former British Columbia Premier Glen Clark who was removed from office by a craftily engineered police raid on his home shown on national TV and orchestrated by friends of Prime Minister Jean Chretien and Freemason Gordon Campbell that included Provincial NDP turncoat, traitor, Freemason Attorney General Ujjal Dosanjh

Freemason Gord Campbell
Dosanjh and Campbell, both being Freemason brothers, had allegiances to each other that took precedence over party loyalty so the Freemason controllers in Vancouver were able to persuade Dosanjh to work with the plan to destroy Premier Glen Clark notwithstanding the fact Campbell and Dosanjh were on different teams, politically. Different puppets under the control of the same Master.

Immediately prior to her appointment as a Supreme Court judge, Elizabeth Bennet went over to the other side of the street and left the Crown Counsel Office in Vancouver and went to work for prominent defence lawyer and Freemason, Richard Peck.

A Freemason Logo
Elizabeth Bennett with her Freemason controllers / puppet masters by way of Richard Peck could be relied upon to keep the lid on the trial so that Campbell, Dosanjh and Chretien would not be exposed as part of the gang that took down Glen Clark. This is one of the ways the dirty judge game is played in British Columbia.

Not long afterwards, in Hawaii, the law caught up to Campbell and put him in prison for a few days because he was drunk out of his "Gord", pun intended, driving the wrong way down a divided highway. A crook is a crook.

Campbell suddenly resigned from his position as Premier of BC office when a couple of bloggers started exposing the fact that he was a using taxpayers money to pay his mistress a salary of $150,000 per year. He and she have not paid back a dime of the money they took under false pretences in violation of the Members Conflict of Interest Act.

In Canada, Freemasonry is actually a criminal organization for two very important reasons

1.  Freemason members use signals, gestures, and code words and code phrases in court proceedings in order to secretly communicate with a judge for the purpose of influencing the outcome of a hearing or trial. As a result innocent people are sent to jail or fined in criminal proceedings or are deprived of equal justice in civil proceedings. British Columbia Freemasonry has a notorious reputation for such shenanigans.

2. Freemasons in Canada do not comply with the mandatory reporting provisions of the Unlawful Societies Act that was passed by the English Parliament in 1799 and that is still part of the law in Canada and can only be repealed by an Act of the Canadian Parliament as a result of the Statute of Westminster passed by the English Parliament in 1932.  The penalty for non-compliance with the Unlawful Societies Act is 7 years imprisonment.

The Unlawful Societies Act of 1799 was passed after the English ruling classes watched the debacles of losing their colonies in the successful American rebellion led by Freemason George Washington and after watching the merciless slaughter of their cousins among the French ruling classes by the successful French rebellion that was also led by prominent Freemasons. 

American and French Freemasonry had a legitimate purpose in the establishment a republican form of government in those countries. 

Canadian Freemasonry is a dangerous criminal organization that has infiltrated the courts and the police.

Click here to read why BC University Professor Robin Matthews thinks Elizabeth Bennett is a dirty judge

There is more coming about the unelected, supposedly unaccountable, Justice Elizabeth Bennett and her pals at the Court of Appeal who are covering up the murder of fellow judges by their decisions.

Click here to read about the MURDER of Federal Court of Appeal Justice Carolyn Layden-Stevenson by Secret Agents of the federal Department of Justice and the BC Ministry of Attorney General


Click here to read about the suspected MURDER of former Chief Justice Brenner of the Supreme Court of British Columbia

In addition to her connections to Freemasonry, which some argue is the real or de facto government of British Columbia, Bennett is deeply connected to the criminal gang inside the Crown Prosecution Service of British Columbia that is an arm of the Ministry of the Attorney General that approved Bennett's appointment to the Supreme Court and her elevation to the Court of Appeal.  When Premier Glen Clark was removed from office he had serious enemies inside the Ministry of the Attorney General who had committed serious crimes under the previous Social Credit regime . Some of these Clark had dismissed outright, while others he had threatened with dismissal.  Clark had enemies within and they were also allies in the coup d'état against him. Elizabeth Bennett could be relied on to protect the identity of these persons and their criminal activity as the prosecution of Premier Glen Clark proceeded and she continues, to this day to abuse her position on the court and make decisions that protects the criminals inside the government, especially her co-workers at the notoriously corrupt British Columbia Ministry of the Attorney General that is engaged in all kinds of serious crimes including child kidnapping to supply the child porn business and child sex trafficking business, drug trafficking dealing, and the use of violence and terrorism to steal private property for the benefit of the civil service pension plan.

Click here to read the Shocking Story of State Sponsored Terrorism in British Columbia and the Looting of the English Family Resort on Vancouver Island 

A key player was former Vancouver Crown Counsel, Austin Cullen, who was specifically promoted to the position of Assistant Deputy Minister for the Attorney General in order to manage the special prosecution of Premier Glen Clark. Cullen had been a co-worker of Bennett at the Vancouver Crown Counsel office and he and the dirty Chief Justice Brenner, made sure Bennett was appointed to preside at the case against Premier Clark because they had the confidence that Bennett would protect the criminal insiders who were involved in the coup d'état against Premier Clark and a host of other crimes.

When all the dirty work against Premier Clark was over and done, Austin Cullen was rewarded by an appointment to the position of a Supreme Court Justice (March 2001) where he earns about $250,000 per year and where he could visit more with his old girl friend, Elizabeth. A few years later Cullen was made Associate Chief Justice of the Supreme Court where he was continues to use his influence to protect the criminals inside the administration of justice.

When Cullen was made a Supreme Court judge he arranged to take with him another girlfriend from the Crown Counsel's Office, namely Heather Holmes, who, along with Elizabeth can be relied on to do dirty justice in cases that need to be fixed, such as the recent case where Justice Heather refused to allow a litigant to have access to court documents that would have disclosed how the system of justice in British Columbia is rigged from the inside and who is behind it the rigging. Heather was protecting criminals and she knew it and she was doing it with the approval of Austin Cullen. The criminals in the court system are determined to protect themselves.

Both Cullen and Bennett show up as major pervert protectors in the files of child sex abuse investigator Rob Nicholson who claims that they rigged a number of cases to protect child molestors when they worked with the Crown Prosecution Service.

The Court of Appeal for British Columbia and the Supreme Court of British Columbia are both cesspools of corruption, filth and criminality.

There are some good and honest judges in the courts but they are afraid to speak out because they may be murdered also.

Several years ago, Justice John Bouck spoke out and revealed to public in a number of major news articles he wrote that the Chief Justice was rigging the court by selecting special judges for special cases just like Chief Justice Bauman is doing at the British Columbia Court of Appeal. 

Sunday, August 9, 2015

How The Civil Service Infiltrated the Court of Appeal for British Columbia?

It is the Editors opinion a fair argument can be made that the justice system, that is the courts, the judges and the clerks, in British Columbia, are no longer independent of the civil service unions.

Suzanne Anton  
Sure some of the judges are straight, but others are owned lock stock and barrel by high level insiders inside the Ministry of Justice and Attorney General of BC.

Suzanne Anton, the Minister, shown in photo on right, is a puppet, is obviously a puppet controlled from insiders. 

A recent decision by her Ministry and the Court of Appeal oif British Columbia at the same time display that a gang of child snatching, paedophile, sex abusing perverts continues to dominate the hierarchy of the BC Government just like the have dominated England and Scotland for decades.

These folks are so bad a BC mother called them SADISTS

After one of the independent judges in British Columbia called them criminals.

Saturday, January 26, 2013

Unions and Criminal Gangs Operating Inside Court Administration

Criminal Gangs Have Infiltrated the Courts in Canada
Judicial independence in Canada is heavily compromised by agents of both criminal gangs and the Canadian public sector union movement.

In British Columbia, for example, several judges are known to be associates or members of a secretive criminal gang with an extensive criminal network thoughout the province.  Members of this criminal gang regularly use gang member judges to fix the outcome of law cases involving fellow members.  The gang has infiltrated some of the police agencies in the Province and plays a behind the secenes role in the political corruption that is widespread in British Columbia.  Unlike the notorious Hell's Angels, this criminal gang keeps an extremely low profile and its criminal activities are not openly discussed by the media due to its tactics of fear and intimidation.  Like the Hell's Angels, this criminal gang has affiliates in other provinces and, based on expert reports that are undenied by Canada's Department of Justice, it has infiltrated the operations of the Supreme Court of Canada.

Click here to learn more about Criminal Gangs in the Canadian judiciary.

Click here to learn about criminal gang operations at the Supreme Court of Canada.

Although judges are not part of the general union movement in Canada, clerical and administratiuve staff at the courthouses across Canada are part of the union movement.  As members of the union movement, court staff are often caught interfering in the administration of justice to benefit their brothers and sisters in the movement. This kind of criminal activity is more often seen in the public service unions where unionized staff commit fraud and obstruction of justice in order to assist their colleagues in other government offices.

Click here to read about unionized Court Staff in Vancouver committing fraud and obstruction of justice to benefit union movement operatives.

Click here to read about unionized Court Staff at the Supreme Court of Canada committing other crime to benefit union movement operatives.

Between 1796 and 1799, Imperial Parliament of the British Empire attempted to address the operations of secret criminal organizations that were then operating throughout the British Empire by enacting the Unlawful Oaths Act and the Unlawful Societies Act.

These laws continue to be part of the law of Canada to this very day but they are not enforced and are somethat archaic in their language.  For example, anyone who is a member of a secret society that does not comply with the Unlawful Societies Act is subject to seven years `transportation` which  meant seven years imprisonment in a British penal colony.

The Canadian Committee for Constitutional Courts recommends that the Unlawful Societies Act and Unlawful Oaths Act be  strictly enforced by the Government of Canada among members of the Canadian judiciary, the legal profession, the police and court registry administrastive staff and that the Acts be amemded to replace the word `transportation`with its modern equivalent of ``ìmprisonment`` .  

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Is Self Insurance A Threat To Judicial Independence

One of the great threats to an independent justice system in Canada is the legal monopoly which is self-insured and self-regulated and from from which all judges are chosen.   

For example, in British Columbia, the legal profession manages its own insurance scheme, while in some provinces with less population the respective legal professions have banded together to manage a similar system that covers their members in the provinces in question. 

So, when a person takes such a claim against his or her former lawyer, the court is no longer independent because the judge and both lawyers may have a sizable financial interest in the outcome.

In the notorious case of Cridge v Harper Grey Easton and others, (2004 BCSC 101 (CanLII)
the plaintiff was denied a jury trial because a judge ruled that a jury would be biased against the lawyers which is another way of saying that the judge will be biased in favour of the lawyer. The plaintiff had hired lawyer after lawyer to pursue her claim and they all delayed taking her case to court.

Eventually, she had to act for herself and proved that the Defendant, a major Canadian law firm, had engaged in a "straightforward case of inexcusable delay, procrastination and neglect of the plaintiff as a client, which did not meet the standard of care of the ordinary, prudent solicitor. A plaintiff’s claim cannot be allowed to languish for 18 years". 

Notwithstanding the obvious mis-conduct by the top drawer law firm, the judge protected her colleagues in the legal profession by refusing to grant aggravated and punitive damages that should have been awarded in such a case and, in convoluted, illogical, reasons, denied compensatory damages which should have been in the range of $1 million.  Instead, the plaintiff was awarded a insulting nominal sum of $100.00 and ordered to pay the costs of law firm. 

The plaintiff's appeal to the Court of Appeal for British Columbia was denied without proper reasons and the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear her appeal.

Having been denied the right to a trial before an independant trubunal and the opportunity for an appropriate appeal at the Supreme Court of Canada, the plaintiff filed a claim with the United Nations Human Rights Commission where her complaint was denied on the basis of representations by the Minister of Justice for Canada, Rob Nicholson, (shown in above photo) that the plaintiff had not exhausted her domestic remedies without identifying what those remedies were. 

To this day, the Minister of Justice for Canada continues to protect the legal profession, of which he is a member, and the judges his Department appointed to the bench by refusing to advise the plaintff what domestic remedies remain available to her.

This is a classic example of how Canada's justice system functions where all the players are part of the same self-insurance schemes and protect each other at the expense of innocent victims with genuine grievances.

The Canadian Committee for Constitutional Courts recommends the following

1. That all claims against lawyers or law firm, the plaintiff be guaranteed the right to a jury trial and that in such claims the plaintiff be entitled to employ lawyers from outside of Canada as her advocates.

Editors Note: The law firm of Harper Grey Easton played a prominent role in one of the greatest legal frauds in Canada that is more fully explained at   

Friday, January 4, 2013

The First Step To Judicial Independence - Reform the Office of the Chief Justice.

Justice John C. Bouck
In his landmark exposee of the role of the Chief Judge or Chief Justice in Canada's various courts, John C. Bouck, a courageous Canadian judge, appealed directly to the public for reform in 1998 with a series of articles appearing in a prominent Canadian newspaper.

Justice Bouck candidly explained that the court system operated like a hockey team.  The Chief Judge, like the hockey coach who decided which players get to play in the game, decided which judges would hear certain cases.  Bouck wrote that there "A- Team" of key players or judges who were favoured by the Chief Justice and "B-Team" of less reliable judges or players.

Bouck wrote that judges from the A-Team were selected by the Chief Justice to handle certain the Chief Justice felt were important while judges from the B-Team were given cases that had no or little importance.  

What Bouck did not write  but what arises as the natural implication from his comments was that the Chief Justice was controlling the outcome of various law cases by the selection of judges he or she could rely on to deliver the verdict that the Chief Justice wished to have delivered.

The implicit conclusion that Chief Justices in Canada manage the outcome of certain law cases is supported by the available data gleaned from many key law cases where certain judges in Canada are regularly observed appearing in certain key cases and then twisting, perverting, bending and breaking the law in order to obtain a certain result. 

Bouck reasoned that one simple way to reform the process was to reform the position of Chief Justice or Chief Judge.

In the case of Canada's superior courts, which include the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal, the Federal Court, the Courts of Appeal and superior courts for all Canadian provinces and territories the Chief Justices in Canada are chosen for their positions by the Prime Minister of Canada and his cabinet with the approval of the Queen or Governor General and they hold that position until they resign or retire.  The retirement age is fixed at age 75 by the Judges Act and Chief Justices in Canada often hold the office for ten years or more giveing rise to complaints of  cronyism and other forms of corruption.

In the case of Provincal Courts, the Chief Judge is appointed by the local provincial Premier and her cabinet with the approval of the Queen's representaitve the Lieutenant Governor.

Bouck aregued that this was wrong.

Bouck argued that the best people to select a Chief Justice was not a politcian who knew nothing about managing a court but instead the judges of the court shold elect one of their members whom they respected and felt was capable and fit for the job, just like a hockey team elects its captain, like the House of Commons elects its speaker or like the Cardinals of Catholic Church elects its Pope.

Bouck also argued that the term of office should be fixed which would enable the judges of the court to control egomaniacal despots from taking over thge system.  Bouck suggested a terms of five years would be reasonable.

The Canadian Committee for Constitutional Courts has carefully reviewed the proposals of Justice John Bouck and advocates that those proposals be adopted, immediately, as a first step towards the establishment of a court system that complies with the requirements of Canadai's Constitution and the provisions of the United Nations Univeral Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Covenant on Political and Civil Rights that mandate an independent and impartial tribunal for the hearing of civil and criminal disputes.

For Chief Justices appointed by the Prime Minister of Canada and his cabinet this would require an appropriate amendment to the Judges Act which sets out the mandatory retirement ages for such judges.

In the case of Provincial Court Chief Judges, a similar amendment would have to be made to the applicable legislation. 

What Justice Bouck did not address was the role the the of the Chief Justice or Chief Judge in matters involving complaints of judicial misconduct.

At the present time, the Chief Justice of Canada, who is also the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, is the Chairperson of the Canadian Judicial Council, a body made up solely of Chief Justices and Associate Chief Justices of Canada's superior courts and courts of appeal. The Canadian Judicial  Council is charged with the responsibility of investigating complaints of mis-conduct by Canada's federally appointed judges.  The obvious problem is that where a Chief Justice selects a member of his "A-Team" of judges to deliver a desired verdict that Chief Justice will naturally use his or her influence to make sure that complaints about judges involved in such verdicts are nre not treated seriously or are rejected on improper grounds.  There are so many well documented cases where this has taken place that Canadians no longer trust the Canadian judiciary as they once did before the Canadian Judicial Council was established in by Canada's, self admitted, communist Prime Minister, Pierre Trudeau, as part of his long term strategy to turn Canada over to the international elites that intend to establish a one world government controlled by a self-selected oligarchs. 

The Canadian Committee for Constitioional Courts submits that a proper reform of the office of the Chief Justice would require a reform of the system that reviews judicial mis-conduct.  Chief Justices should be completely removed from the process of examining and investigating complaints of judicial misconduct except in cases where their evidence is required to assist a hearing panel in their deliberations.